Legal Ruling Coronavirus fines (UK)

Administrative Court overturn conviction for refusing to provide name and address in relation to suspected breach of Coronavirus Regulations.

https://www.gardencourtchambers.co.uk/news/administrative-court-overturn-conviction-for-refusing-to-provide-name-and-address-in-relation-to-suspected-breach-of-coronavirus-regulations

Reckless disregard

Have you ever been in a conversation with someone telling you that you’re being selfish because you don’t wish to take part in Russian roulette with your health by injecting “experimental” mRNA into your body?

Or maybe you don’t want to wear a face covering, which are the equivalent of face nappies, and which are nothing like professional PPE, and which are shown by the science to do more harm than good. Bacterial pneumonia being a serious side effect.

In civil law, people have a duty to conduct themselves in a reasonable manner towards other people. It is unreasonable to prioritise virtual signalling over safeguarding and protecting health.

Particularly in the case of children and vulnerable adults.

There is a saying for this type of abandonment of logic and reason, it is called “reckless disregard”.

It is also morally abhorrent and a sign of low emotional intelligence if a person ridicules someone else for not wishing to engage in actions that expose them to 100% liability for the risk of serious and/or life threatening adverse reactions caused by an experimental mRNA jab operating under an “emergency” licence.

1.

reckless disregard

United States Patent

“CORONA VIRUS ISOLATED FROM HUMANS”

Legally; the above “Statement” ; “CORONA VIRUS ISOLATED FROM HUMANS” is regarded as babble, it has no jurisdiction in language because it is using “SIGNS” from a language other than English to masquerade as English, that is, it uses ASL (American Sign Language) “GLOSS” without any-correspondence-between-the-words, i.e. “CORONA-VIRUS-ISOLATED-FROM-HUMANS” would have meaning and standing.

SARS the invented virus.

German Court in Weimar Declares Lockdown Unconstitutional

A LANDMARK legal decision declared that regional containment policies – including lockdowns, social distancing, prohibitions on gatherings by family or friends) are UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The judge called the lockdowns a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives.”

German Court in Weimar Declares Lockdown Unconstitutional